Do you think a celebrity who turns down a multi-million dollar deal solely because the organization doesn't allow him smoking weed is a reckless financial decision?
When it comes to such deals, it's not always about basing everything about financial gain, and considering this is about a celebrity...this means self image, reputation is everything and if you became a celebrity as an activist against drugs..there is no way you will endorse a drug related brand just because they are paying you well. Should you go for the money, expect your celebrity status to go down the drainage!!!
Keep in mind this definition of reckless financial decision - It entails when a person makes choices that involve significant financial risk or lack of consideration for the potential consequences.
I guess by definition given above, this qualifies to be a reckless financial decision, case closed!