That's what "we" like to say.


"Anything is possible." almost


"This" is much better than referring to a singular as a "they".  I find that irritating too... even though I am more or less accepting of the royal "we" especially if it is used in knowing ways rather than without thinking about it.


Yeah.. this is an amazing number (84.9%).

I am not opposed to it when the asset grows into it, but I am still sticking with the idea of 5% to 25% initial allocation, so maybe then the next part would be to ONLY reallocate once it gets above 84.9%.. which might be a bit more reasonable, but even with that it still seems a bit too much of an allocation, even with the idea of letting your winners run, even though I am probably near if not over that number right now... but largely I only started with 13.5% as my own initial investment and my investment seems to have grown and/or gotten close to 84.9% and/or higher numbers at various points in time, but I never really reallocated in any meaningful way, since there had even been times that I had gotten close to 90% thresholds that were probably around historical bitcoin tops 2021, and I think in 2017, I had ONLY gotten to around 80%-ish...

I am probably close to 90% now, even though I have not gotten into specific calculations, recently since sometimes it can take a bit of time to get a somewhat updated ballpark idea. 

Actually, now that I am talking through this, I am thinking that I might have to switch some of my valuation over to my valuation that is based on the 200-WMA rather than to valuate based on BTC spot price, so that I could be more consistent with my recent lecturings/advocacy on the valuation topic.. that may well bring my allocation valuation down to around mid-70%s rather than upper 80%s.. I might have to do that..