All of the tools work in the same way and produce similar outcomes; they are simply different names for the same software.
This is not true at all and you provided evidence yourself when you gave an example of a post flagged by
only one AI detection tool. The others identified it as human-written content.
I've seen that every well-written post with proper punctuation is automatically rated "Fake" by these softwares.
That's not true either. You just made a well-written post with proper punctuation. None of the AI detection tools have flagged it as "fake".
It's insane to have your reputation tarnished because of what some random websites say.
Looks like you haven't checked your trust summary recently. Remember that post from last year? The one that earned you a lovely "shitposter" tag from Hueristic?
Here's a reminder in case you forgot:
Stick to a player that's outstanding and confident in scoring points. Every team do triggered winning and losing, we have potentials of winning, if they do not have this hope, they wouldn't have compete or contend for any solidable points in the league. Thrilling victory is achievable and everyone has the right to be able to place wager on games. We all have choices to make and our favorites in the game. @morvillz making an exception of choosing Wilson or Flacco over Brownings bases on the tactical date examined, but the same underrated Brownings is the favorite of most viewers in the system.
Still think spewing nonsense is a winning strategy?
My problem could be with the grammarly keyboard I'm using; English is not my native language, so I use the grammarly keyboard to fix and improve my phrases after they've been written. It's possible that these AI detector sites picked up most of posts enhanced by Grammarly keyboards. I do not know. @powerGlove is this possible? I know you're a tech wizard.
That's possible, but highly unlikely. These AI detection tools go far beyond basic grammar checks. They are analyzing things like: sentence structure, statistical patterns and predictability of word choices. Just like generative AI models, they work on probabilities. The more "red flags" a post raises across these various metrics, the higher the likelihood it's AI-generated content.