If we are to even consider the replies on this thread on recommendations for the platforms that accept the use of VPN, I don't think there are suggestions made and if any at all, they are not many, gambling platforms don't usually demand or take in the use of VPN for their website, but Incase we see some that allows for that, maybe they are just new in the business or doesn't have enough resources to employ for the measures that take care on that.
Most of the new casino is the one that very strict on VPN users because they are strictly complying with their license and at the same time to protect their casino from multiple account abuse.
Most of the casino that is still VPN friendly are those established one since they want their loyal customers to become free as much as possible. Big online casino has system that can detect if users have VPN that use to bypass the casino rules that’s why they are confident to allow VPN with their players.
I guess that site either go "full rogue" like no KYC, no questions and sometimes the chance of them simply disappearing in an exit scam, versus the all compliant sites that really care about being always in the right side of the (US mostly) regulations for gambling and money laundering. Essentially, you have to chose the first category if you are seeking to use VPN.
However, the use of a VPN always hints, or rather even openly tells the casino site that its client does not want the casino to know his location.
I do not consider cases where a site, by decision of the authorities of a particular country, is simply blocked on the territory of that country and the player simply cannot use the site and play without a VPN. In all other cases, this signal about maintaining the anonymity of the player’s location theoretically makes this player not very reliable from the point of view of the casino itself. And in this case, the likelihood immediately increases that the casino will begin to require KYC and the player’s anonymity will be completely lost.
In general, it turns out that gambling players who want to remain anonymous for various reasons are left to choose casinos that are not very reliable and not too well-known, which indeed increases the likelihood for such players to encounter fraudulent casino sites. In this I see clear discrimination against anonymous players. And for some reason everyone thinks that non-anonymous players are somehow “more correct” than anonymous players.
But this is completely wrong and this discrimination against people based on the principle of anonymity/non-anonymity, in my opinion, should be stopped.
Moreover, this must be done at the legislative level.
Otherwise, humanity will turn into a “digital concentration camp” and “digital slavery.”