Though I agree that [as I said previously] if OP's KYC shown signs of duress or perhaps even domestic abuse, what they should do is notify the authorities instead of confiscating fund, I won't jump too fast to a conclusion before understanding every side. Perhaps, if the situation BC tried to bring to our awareness involved OP being in a situation where she is clearly "unfit" for a KYC or being forced, like [at an extreme] being held at gun point, or pushed and forced to sit in front of the camera, perhaps they were concerned that the real operator of the user ID #23428479 is someone who tried to bypass account restriction by borrowing her ID, and upon the request of KYC, understanding that their picture won't match her ID, forced her to take her picture.
This is why I ask her what was her situation during that KYC that could trigger BC to classify it as under duress. If it's a mere sweating etc, then it's probably a misunderstanding and an overreaction from BC.
I know you’re trying to help, but this is a clear case of thievery by BC Games. If they had concerns about the OP's KYC, a simple video call with the OP would have resolved that. They suspect abuse, they have the OP’s details and address from their documents, and have not reported it to the police, but they've happily decided to keep the money for themselves. Let's not pretend this is something else; it's a clear case of theft and it's shady as hell.
If you would spare some time to weight the story from all sides while standing on a neutral ground, and try to take one or two steps ahead by guessing every possible scenario, I believe you'll see that you're jumping to conclusion. Talking about shady as hell and a clear case of... theft, though, I can't help but wonder where are you coming from?
I mean, not trying to accuse you of anything, simply weighting from all sides and trying to consider as much possible scenario as I can, here's some key fact:
1. You're caught as an identity thief, selling account with people's KYC, as reflected on your
trust page2. Your last post was by 2 June 2023, and you popped right into this thread
3. You insist that BC should accept her KYC or retake it
I have to say that I can't help but consider it is a very nice coincidence that fits the imaginery scenario in my head, about her being forced to do KYC as I described, "
or pushed and forced to sit in front of the camera, perhaps they were concerned that the real operator of the user ID #23428479 is someone who tried to bypass account restriction by borrowing her ID, and upon the request of KYC, understanding that their picture won't match her ID, forced her to take her picture."
Can anyone else tell me if I am being way too imaginative and paranoid or is that a legit scenario and a way too eerie coincidence?
[...]
About this case, bc support is just figuring out what to do next. Once they come to a conclusion I am sure bc will update here.
Any evidence of that? or just your guess? do you wear guess? <3 stay put.
Actually... yes, there is an evidence of that. I can provide an evidence that BC's representative is currently trying to figure out what to do next, but I don't think that'll be wise of me to do so. As such, I hope, without going to much details, my words holds some water when I said that
AHOBRAUSE's educated guess is actually correct, that BC's team are indeed trying to find a way and that their representative are not sitting on their hand.
Joana226, it'll be very much appreciated and helpful if you can answer my question on previous post.