Lol it's the price that fell not the quantity you own
With its intrinsic value and potential price
We still rich
Always would be as long as we have some BTC in our wallet.
You keep Bitcoin in a wallet?
I prefer cold storage addresses. Safer.
I thought they were all called wallet
Both Hot and cold.
Planning on getting one though
But considering the idle fund, not to mention not currently in my home base residence that I can feel better hiding it.
Heard its easier to hold with cold wallet since its time consuming to move your coin to a hot wallet
These terms in regards to how hot or how cold any wallet might be are all relative, and surely some kinds of wallets are more detached from abilities to tamper with them, but some of the kinds of wallets are overly complicated, so even if they might be secure, we could be putting some of our coins at risk through over complication.
When Jimbo refers to "cold storage address" he is referring to kinds of paperwallets, and many of us likely don't even know how to do paper wallets, and perhaps that makes them more secure, even though there have been some suggestions that some paperwallets had issues in terms of the way their keys were generated - but maybe they are also less vulnerable if there is ONLY a certain amount of value in each paper wallet, so it might be doubtful if they all might end up being compromised at one time, if any of them might have had been vulnerable to the ways their keys had been generated.
Similar with hardware wallets. They can have some vulnerabilities in key generation but also in terms of the way they interact with servers and even questions of back doors - though it is thought that the more open source they are then the less likely for trickery in terms of the code being run... I am surely not going to claim to be an expert or even to know about all of the various tradeoffs in terms of how much value might be held in certain ways in order to trigger different practices, because some kinds of solutions might take some time to learn and also to figure out that they might not be as great as they appear to be, which I think is the case with the new device (named Bitkey) launched by Block.. which is likely going to be very popular, yet it does not seem to be a device that is really facilitating self-sovereignty so I cannot be sure if it is worse to lead the masses in a kind of deception about their own level of self-sovereignty through such a device that is likely to be popular.
It's kind of funny that countries are now 'reporting' that they bought ONE extra bitcoin.
Or, maybe, they just messed up the phrase in english.
In comparison, Saylor scoops thousands, aka Saylor=many many countries.
Sovereign individual, indeed.
Something seems to be wrong with Saylor.
Normies should not be attempting to emulate that behavior... for reasons I already mentioned in my earlier post.