I wonder why these two brothers receive different impressions when both are running a gambling platform, honestly, I prefer my friends and relatives to bet on the lotto but I advise them to be careful when playing in a cockpit, because in a cockpit arena, you can wipe out all your money and you end up empty-handed because the games are continuous you have no control and you are tempted to continue playing or lose everything whereas in Lotto you can allocate your bets.
Gamblers will bet on the games they like. I have never seen anyone who bet against their willing on any other game. And those who the owner of the gambling platform will usually win. I don't think they have a problem with a gambler criticising. In gambling, one will win, the other will lose, and so the gambling will continue. Moreover, it is natural that different gamblers will have different opinions.
Personal preference often influences the betting decisions, because they may have insights or knowledge about certain teams, players, or outcomes that they believe will give them an edge. Gambling platforms are accustomed to criticism from gamblers, because it's a expected part of the industry. Platforms may benefit from gamblers' losses, but they also understand that maintaining a positive reputation and ensuring customer satisfaction is crucial for long-term success. Constructive criticism can provide valuable feedback for platforms to improve their services and address any concerns raised by gamblers.
The variability of the outcomes ensures that the gambling experience remains dynamic and unpredictable. This attracts people with different opinions, preferences, and strategies. Indeed, different gamblers will have different opinions and approaches to gambling, this diversity enriches the gambling experience, because gamblers bring their unique perspectives, insights, and strategies to the table that contribute to the overall excitement and competitiveness of the activity.