If every leader is given very strict laws in his country, then theft, robbery, bad deeds etc. will be less or will not happen in his country.
Strict laws in a country are good, but there is absolutely no guarantee that bad things will not happen, such as theft, robbery and so on. Because the leader will definitely find a way to do the bad things he wants if he has the intention to do so, so the strictness of the law is also not a serious obstacle to prevent bad things from happening in a particular country. Because the only thing that can be a barrier to preventing bad things from happening in a country is an honest heart's intention not to want to do that thing.
If the leadership of every country is good, its country will be very prosperous, if its leadership is bad, then the people of that country will also be bad. Every leadership should be given fairly and no false shelter should be given so that everyone in their country can receive a fair trial. If the leadership in his country is good, the people will behave in order, the word of their leadership will spread all over the world and criticism of them that they are running the country very well will be reflected in their actions.
The overall benchmark is not just a leader, but also the voters of that leader in the country, because the leaders of most countries are definitely chosen by the people so it is the people who determine what their best choice is. Now choosing a leader must be filtered seriously and correctly because from this a good leader will be born, even though all of this is also based on a leader's heart in carrying out his leadership period for a country. Because there are also good leaders, but the people are not good and there must be something wrong with that leader.