Overall, IMO, Klopp is better than Ten Haag, we really can't judge MU success in winning the match against Liverpool as Ten Haag overall success in the EPL. However, in Liverpool history, Klopp has given Liverpool the important title they have always wanted, the EPL Trophy. Meanwhile, Ten Haag still hasn't been able to prove the effectiveness of his strategy in the EPL so far. I'm not saying Ten Haag is very bad, but it's not right to compare him with Klopp, who has been at Liverpool for several seasons. And we can't blame Klopp for losing results against MU, even Liverpool losing their 1st position.
Yes it is evident, the person who says Ten Hag is successful maybe he is too fanatical. Kloop has been Liverpool for almost 9 years and has plenty of winning evidence. So his coaching career I consider quite successful. As for Ten Hag, he hasn't given any evidence at Man United so he's not in good coaching at the moment. One game is not a measure of a coach's success. Even Kloop is one of the coaches that amazes me besides Guardiola.
True, and I've met some people who have said that if Ten Hag has been so successful as a United manager, it's very strange to hear that. Have they ever been aware of the accomplishments of ten hag with united? It was only able to win the Carabao Cup and no more. I would rather call Mourinho, who is a few steps ahead of him, Ten Hag. Ten hag is still far compared to the mourinho and i could not even understand why united sacked mourinho out from the club last seasons. The strange thing to remember is that people blamed Mourinho, and the results were not even worse than the ten hag. It's difficult to understand what metrics those people used to define Ten Hag as a successful coach. Ten Hag gave only the Carabao Cup, which is nothing in comparison to Mourinho's European Cup.