For me, it is enough for Bitcoin to be legally accepted as a payment method. It doesn't have to be a legal tender to perform its function. If countries recognize Bitcoin as a currency, that would already be enough.
For Bitcoin to become a legal tender is a long shot, and could even just be considered as an extra mile. Bitcoin doesn't have to be a legal tender for businesses and customers to accept it as payment. I think it is enough catalyst for Bitcoin's adoption rate for a government to declare it as an acceptable currency.
It's true, and I agree with what you say. Just for a country to recognize Bitcoin is enough to teach its subjects to adopt it in their country, and that's fine. It seems like here in our country he is recognized, but Bitcoin or cryptocurrency is not legal tender here in us.
And so far, so good for the few years that we have been here. It means that even though Bitcoin is decentralized and we know that if it is regulated by the government, people can still adopt it. And the government can also tax the crypto earners if they want to do it because they have the authority to do it.