Guess what, after all he ended up returning $10 to his friend.
So I ask, did the friend do well in returning $10 to his friend or the returned $10 was not enough?
The guy is really a very good guy to even return a dime to his friend, after all, there was no rule defining any refund policy before the engagement, or was there one??. He Forgets one thing, which is that at that point, the funds no longer belongs to him, but his friend. Now, if he gambled online and lost the funds to a casino, would he go back to instruct the casino on how much to refund to him?. Of course not, so let him accept his fate ave stop acting like an over grown baby.
To me, in general, that seems wickedness of gambling between friends on a P2P because such friends are not worthy to be trusted considering the sentiments in playing to win.
I would say that is a daylight extortions amongst each others.
Daylight extortion you say?.
Was he forced to gamble?.
Why did he involve funds that he's not willing to lose in the gambling act?.
Honestly bro, these your judgment is based on pure sentiments. In the streets you take risks, and those risks you take, be sure and ready to bear the consequences, you don't do something expecting a pattern of response from another person, unless its previously agreed upon, with a third party as a witness, else you're entirely on your own with your expectations.