I came across friends fighting throwing words at each other one was expressing his disappointments at his other friend while the other was mocking at him.
It was discovered that the one mocking the other asked the other one to step on let them gamble on a P2P and on the process the one being mocked lost all his funds for the other guy. And he has been asking the guy that won the crown to return him return about 30% out of the $190 lost but the other guy told him that there is no return and no compensations in the gamble so if he must give him back some returns it would be based on his own will.
First of all, the gambler in loss shouldn't have listened to the mockery of his "friend". People don't have to accept challenges imposed by others, because they don't have to prove anything to people around. That was the first big mistake of him, and I hope he learns a lesson with this story in order to not act impulsively provoked by others in the future never again. The second mistake was to demand the money lost back. It was a bet, and he decided to risk his money. As consequence he lost it and should have gone away with empty pockets, but with his dignity intact.
Guess what, after all he ended up returning $10 to his friend.
So I ask, did the friend do well in returning $10 to his friend or the returned $10 was not enough?
Was the 10$ cashback another mockery of him towards his friend? Because that is how it sounds like...
To me, in general, that seems wickedness of gambling between friends on a P2P because such friends are not worthy to be trusted considering the sentiments in playing to win.
I would say that is a daylight extortions amongst each others.
If you spot a friend of yours isn't prepared to deal with losses as consequences of bets, then don't gamble against him. Choose carefully who are the friends you can gamble P2P. There must be one person or another to play P2P who will accept the defeat without further arguing and contentions.