Well, your piece of work attempts to evoke emotions from a certain segment of the population in this forum. I mean those who would consider the plights of the underdeveloped nations as a result of Western imperialists.
Nevertheless, ownership begets leadership, and the latter directs the entire society composed of followership. So if the ownership is not interested in the welfare of the society, what can the leadership do, except revolt. The latter works for the interests of the former.
Except the ownership is indigenized and there emerges a benevolent leadership, the developing nations would still be in the polyphemus cave of the developed nations, and subsequent leadership of any guise would be a great failure.