Hey guys, if you can provide an argument as to why robbery is objectively immoral under any circumstances, I'll be impressed.
Otherwise, you must stop saying "blah blah moral blah blah rights."
Go read some Nietzsche and come back to us. Most of us have passed Philosophy 101. We know there is no objective morality. However, it is certain that property rights encourage the sustention of life. They give people incentive to produce in the first place. Otherwise, you must stop saying "blah blah moral blah blah rights."
Philosophy, blah. The only analysis that matters is materialist analysis -- gotta agree with Marx on that. I'm too busy to read useless philosophy
Now, I must point out that your support of the "sustention [sic] of life" is not consistent with your other posts, in which you say that if someone is about to die, nobody should be forced to feed them. Is that really why you support your absolutist system of property rights?
Taxation and coercion reduce the incentive to produce... this is true. They do not completely eliminate it though. Why is your system of morality superior to mine, which values fairness more than an absolutist system of rights?