The way he divides the buying on dips is not necessarily lump sum investing, so guys here like to mix categories and say that lump sum investing is going on because a large amount might be invested on the dip, and I consider that to be sloppy thinking that fails to recognize and appreciate the difference in the categories.. even though some times the categories can seem like they overlap, but they likely can still be considered in their separate conceptual frameworks in order to make decisions based on the different kinds of trade-offs that might exist based on how a guy might choose to invest any sum of money that he has coming in.
I'm quite new here and I'm still doing some reading through, so I think from what you have just explained a lump sum is not every big money we throw into bitcoin, like in the case you used where the guy had a new amount of 6k and if he had decided to invest all right away that would have been a lump sum cause he made his purchase once and with a huge amount and if he maybe dividend it into three parts equal or not and invested them on intervals that would be a DCA buying Which I had understood from your recent comments on the board.
Sir my question is if a person can make lump sum with a small amount, like I've read about how we can mix our strategies to have a maximum effect on our accumulation, like when we set aside some amount to buy on dips and this money is not up to 1k or maybe equal with the allocation you normally give to DCA , would I still call it a lump sum buying.