My confusion though,
It’s there really much to that, with this being a wallet of some kind. Haven’t completely got an idea about it yet but, i the platform in question would always serve as escrow to whatever transacting that is been done and if that be the case, then there would be little need to worry about the other party’s fulfillment of its end to the bargain.
Or am I misunderstanding anything here.
Game theory generally implies that if there is a way to profit from cheating a system, someone will inevitably attempt it. Better to make it as secure as possible and make cheating infeasible. Limit the temptation for people to try.
It's better still to build incentivisation into a system to encourage people to cooperate. Make the system more profitable to secure than it is to cheat, like satoshi managed to achieve with the alignment of incentives in Bitcoin. But that's no easy feat to pull off.