block size should be increased based on specific measurement (e.g. cost of hardware and cost of running) , rather than choosing arbitrary number (just like what BSV did).
Not your call. Block size will only be altered if/when those securing the chain collectively agree to bear that cost. No formula or measurement will make that decision for them. The impetus will come from them and not the other way around.
The scaling debate proved pretty conclusively that people talking about what it "
should" be are just making noise. The only thing that matters is what non-mining nodes will offer to relay and what miners support. And that will be determined by the code people are choosing to run.
If code doesn't exist to support your view or you aren't actively running that code, you're achieving nothing. Everything else is just a somewhat worthless opinion.
conclusion
doomads cult admits core authority where users have no say or choice over code.. because "backward compatibility" doesnt make choice it just allows things to pass without checking if core uses its softened rules to change things. where user nodes bypass rejecting things it does not have rules for
the non-mining nodes he speaks of are not user nodes with "backward compatibility" he speaks of the core nodes that are altered by core and their sponsors (NYA economic nodes) to elevate their control.. to allow/reject what THEY do-dont want.. everyone else is just a follower of core code change after the fact of core politics
doomad will use his cult recruits to REKT anyone releasing proposals/code that has not gone through the core moderation policy of technical discussion to even get a proposal to elevate beyond discussion