Yes, I agree with this helpful suggestion. By reducing the number of games chosen as combinations, we can significantly decrease the risk of losing. Many people consistently lose because they select numerous games in hopes of winning a large sum of money. However, it's important to understand that games are primarily based on luck. By minimizing risky bets, we can increase our chances of success. Let's consider a scenario where I've been betting on a combination of teams like Real Madrid, Manchester City, Arsenal, or Liverpool throughout the season. Even if they experience losses, the impact wouldn't be as severe compared to someone who relies solely on luck by combining 25 teams every weekend to win big. It's wiser to select teams with a higher probability of winning and wager an amount of money that one can afford to lose rather than combining multiple uncertain teams.
Seriously speaking, I don't see why gamblers who are familiar with viewing premier league once or twice per week, would pick clubs they don't know in Italian leagues. Your strategy is fine, gambling on teams you are sure will win more than losing in the premier league. However, greed has influenced gamblers, especially low rollers, to blindly gamble for an endless stream of wealth. One aim which like the Red Sea will be hard to cross or achieve. Building up analytical knowledge on a team is a gratifying exercise as a gambler. The losses will be lesser for the gambler. An advantage to smoothly enjoy the gambling process, and no snowing under with work, searching for teams, and analysis. The teams you listed above can surprisingly perform better than most teams in the premier league. And fully deserve to be staked money upon.
Unfortunately, they don't play matches on the same days. Hence, naive low rollers, wouldn't care about a strategy that insists on picking four games or below. Instead, due to the wealth they foresee, the player will pick up more unknown teams to boost his results on the gambling slips. Such behaviors only attract losses rather than wins, unlike gambling on well-known teams. As you said, the teams we watch their matches with are better off, compared to strange football teams from unfamiliar leagues. What is the essence of wagering money on a team, one wouldn't watch play. That's a blank idea of gambling. Money fuels such ideas, but painfully the gambler loses. Yet he'll repeat similar mistakes next weekend. Sure, wagering low amounts on a few matches, when we win, attracts lesser profits, but at least there was a win. And it feels better than losing.