In my opinion, the lawsuit claim should never have been made unless he was really willing to do it. Clearly, he was calling their bluff and it did not work.
I can only state from experience that I do get very disappointed when reading claim about how the alleged victim of a current scam has wagers x$million of various casino/gaming sites yet they do not prove anything. Having said that, just because it
be proved someone has wagered $13 million it does not mean it provides evidence they are or are not telling the truth on this occasion.
The OP has the option to complain to the Curacao licence authority (if he has not already done it) but what I would like the OP is this now he is aware BC Game will not give him the $90,000 he is claiming, apart from posting here with his complaint what exactly will he do next?
Can I at least ask them to show evidences accordingly to their terms of service, of any failure from my side? We are talking about over $90.000 claim, so I'm not asking too much. More than "interpretations", physical evidences supported by their terms.
[CC: JollyGood]
It's actually explained by them in between-lines, and been explained to you by me [in form of educated theory] throughout the entire thread, sealed by
BC.Game Support's report of the video call.
Initially, they suspected that your "mom" is performing KYC under duress, of which our suspicion gets stronger and stronger as the case and posts on this thread gets further and you show questionable traits, like the cluelessness of what "under duress" is about, that you basically has zero knowledge of your situation and surroundings when you took that KYC picture.
But, to be short, from BC side, and about what violation you did, they suspected you trying to circumvent a restriction they put on you [the son], be it account limitation, self exclusion, account ban, falsifying ID, and the likes, that your mom shows duress because she performed that KYC against her will, i.e. you forced her.
Bottom line,
What violation you did: a possible attempt to circumvent account limitation and providing fake KYC.
Physical evidence: the video call, where the "real player" [the mom] basically clueless about the game she's been playing for a while.
What terms in the ToS related to it: I have them safely stored for you in my gallery, but I believe it'll be best to start make that lawyer of yours useful. Here's the
link to their ToS, I believe he can ventured a very-well-educated guess of what violation you did.