Also if you read the article here you can see that it was an easily secured bet. " In the first game against the Clippers, Sportsbooks had Porter’s props set at over/under 5.5 points, 4.5 rebounds, 1.5 assists and 0.5 three-pointers. At the time, Porter had per game averages of 4.9 points, 3.4 rebounds, 2.2 assists and 0.7 three-pointers. "
The under's on this game if you are a professional capper you can clearly see an advantage here and maybe a mistake from the odds makers that they now are trying to come back on. As well as multiple people not in the game so the thought of his game play was greater then actually played.
Say everyone would have bet this over and lost to the under. Do you think there would be an investigation in the biggest losses for the day.
Honestly all this isn't sitting very well with me on the whole sports betting topic.
Sports Book looses big. Private investigation. Sports book wins big. Swept under the rug no real public knowledge.
You did see how he played, right?
Also, like I said, all your bets before have been a fraction of what you then bet on this guy. Nobody is normally betting big on this kind of player ( 2 way contract end of the bench guy), especially not that big.
A guy like him getting the most prop bets of all NBA players that day? Nah man.
Anyway, this case changed real quick with the big investigation now. Anyway, good luck, doesn't look good now and your accusation has no merit for the moment since there is an open investigation and you can't blame them for waiting for the result.
PS: a real sports handicapper doesn't play at stake by the way, the odds on that site are terrible compared to other places.