I read it and it is clearly stated that your respond didn't correspond with borovichok and even with LoyceV comment. You just want to interpret it to your own way and trying to justify the comment. What borovichok said is very clear and any interpretation can be used for future reference. This is the jury in the forum and our comments must be clear for everyone understanding and not a personal Glossary Of Legal Terms. Well the guy in question has already gave up his account but according to him, he will come back again when good AI Detectors have developed in the forum, then he will ask the AI Detectors to visit his posting history and analyze them. And I think this the simple interpretation of borovichok comment there.
It somewhat saddens me that accounts like yours will one day be Legendary.
Enough of the AI detectors are already good enough right now, which is why dozens of his posts have been deleted as "AI spam."
So he disagrees with their findings because he thinks they are inferior detector services. Meanwhile when used in concert, all they are doing is pointing out the reality that he is using ChatGPT to generate his posts for him. So what he's really doing is waiting for an AI text generator that won't get caught by the detectors we use on this forum.
Its quite simple to understand really. And yes as part of "the jury in this forum" you are allowed to have your own opinion that disagrees with my assessment.