I read it and it is clearly stated that your respond didn't correspond with borovichok and even with LoyceV comment. You just want to interpret it to your own way and trying to justify the comment. What borovichok said is very clear and any interpretation can be used for future reference. This is the jury in the forum and our comments must be clear for everyone understanding and not a personal Glossary Of Legal Terms. Well the guy in question has already gave up his account but according to him, he will come back again when good AI Detectors have developed in the forum, then he will ask the AI Detectors to visit his posting history and analyze them. And I think this the simple interpretation of borovichok comment there.
Well you are doing a good job in the forum. One merit for you. Continue doing it but interprete it for general understanding.
I'm sorry, but I'll have to agree with nutildah on this one. Borovichok is practically still denying the findings from the AI detectors, and claiming that he'll return to this thread to prove us all wrong. Still playing the victim mentality that he has fallen a victim of inaccurate findings from AI detectors. Even on the previous reports, he was still blaming something else, that his English was too perfect or that grammar correctors made his posts susceptible to the AI scanners.
It's astonishing that he's still playing the victim here, when he already had two chances to stop using AI. That's some audacity in there.