Students are peculiar people in any society of the world. The most vibrant and articulate social class in contemporary capitalist societies. The repository of both ancient and modem knowledge which could entitle them to top hierarchy positions in work places. Which means management cadre is an exclusive preserve of the students in this world of work.
But this ideal trajectory could only be manifested by the students when there exists a vibrant and articulate student Union in the society that puts pressure on the state and it's management team to provide the blueprint for implementation.
Because the crisis of Capitalism could  only be ameliorated through the equal access to power for negotiations by all social classes aggregated on the criteria of Unionism, which the students are entitled to the game.
In the European countries, the United States of America and other advance countries, the student Union as a distinct body is recognized and accorded the privileges for Good Life all over. It enjoys social security packages and other palliatives so that they could withstand the abrasive crisis of Capitalism.
But in the third world nations, students Unionism are more of the words than actions. The students are factionalized on ethnic and religious boundaries. These primodial particularities are the causes of the failures of the students to obtain a better bargain from the state.
I would like the population of this forum to contribute to this great debate. Thanks.