I assume the question in the topic title is rhetorical, right? Just in case: I wouldn't hire (chatbot) spammers.
The campaign managers only see the money, and the websites (who are not here) only see the traffic.
We've had
Signature Campaign Guidelines since 2016, but they're not really enforced.
The reason I brought it up was because of reputable users here who says my post are not of good quality, and I asked him how he evaluates his post yet there is no good reason than pointing hands at punctuation, comas, full-stop and whatever.., that is byegone.
You’re not a bad poster and shouldn’t take what LoyceV said to heart (at least not in a negative way).
SmartGold01 is misinterpreting my post (again):
Haven seen what you shared makes me to understand how you do justify post qualities
You're misinterpreting my post. Proper punctuation doesn't make a quality post, but it helps in wanting to read it. If you just post a wall of text that's not nice to read, I won't read it. There's far too much data on the internet to waste time on bad writers. I just checked
your Merit history, and I've never sent you anything. I recognize your nickname, and you're not on my Ignore list. I've Merited
3050 unique users and I'm always trying to get rid of sMerits so I'm not very picky.
The result is this:
Hello LoyceV I don't have this idea you review post history as well, maybe it might skip my memory so I decided to utilize the chance you posted on that topic to report some of my post as you said.
You and I have different definitions of good posts. I tried all 6 posts, but couldn't get past the first 2 lines.
It would probably help if he would proofread his own text before posting. Use the Preview button and edit a few times.
If I ever manage a campaign then I won't consider such users in my campaigns. If the member in my managed campaign use AI content in a mistaken way then I may give that member a second chance with a warning that if he/she found to be using AI generated content again then I'll blacklist him/her and he/she won't be able to participate in campaigns that I may manage in future.
If I become a campaign manager then my focus will be to select those members who are active members of the forum and who make post themselves not copy/paste AI generated content and consider it as their own. I would look for each post of the participants that I accept in my campaign and if any of those contain AI generated content then I will personally send that user a private message with warning that if he/she continue positing such content then I will remove him/her from the campaign.
At initial stage of my management career I would only consider those members who actively contribute to the forum and are some of the known names of the forum. But, overtime I may select all those members that make quality posts and contribute to the forum in one way or other. I would give main priority to the quality/contribution of the member that I accept in my campaign. I may look for merits, reputation, trust ratings, and some other details of that user, but again my main priority should be quality of the posts and contribution of that member.
Since we're in a topic about who to hire, I'll address this: I noticed in
this post that you're just repeating what has been said already, and then say the same thing again with different words. In this post you type a lot, but you don't say much. This comes to mind:
If you can post a constructive post in 12 words, you don't need to make it longer.