I'll invite you to read my posts again, carefully, and return here once you did.
Sorry my bad, I can see why you misunderstood me. My last post was supposed to be an explanation for the other readers why value betting isn't something bad.
BC? Why BC? GekkeBelg opened scam accusations across many platforms. The most recent one, of which prompt BGC to finally do his investigation, was with coins.game. People are talking in general here, and you're focusing on... BC? Because he didn't get refund on that case, or for what reason is it does BC specifically being mentioned over and over?
Why did I mention BC.Game so much? It's just random luck. First I pointed out that GekkeBelg made a mistake against them. Then I found their 'betting academy' and wanted to point out the hypocrisy of sportbooks.
Because he didn't get refund on that case
They ended up paying GekkeBelg, even though they didn't have to(According to their TOS).
Overall I think we are on the same page.
Does that automatically translates that GekkeBelg is, WinTomato aside, innocent here? I say, "no".
Though I would say yes, but obviously I'm very biased.