On this case, Jambler actually do the exact opposite of mixers in the sense of laundering money; receiving tainted money and sending them all clean and shiny.
Mixers do two things. Receive money (be it tainted or not) and send money, to break the link. Jambler's partners use the Jambler API to do that. You could argue that every other mixer receives "tainted" and sends "clean" coins, just as well.Am I the only reading that they perform blockchain analysis to prevent investors from scamming Jambler?
Quote from: https://jambler.io/become-seller.php
This stage makes it possible to terminate attempts of unfair investors to use an investment admittance as a mixer in order to clear their money and gain profit at the same time.
Examining coins to check that the investor doesn't try to cheat the system, and examining coins to avoid receiving "tainted" coins are two different things.
Do I understand things wrongly? I thought, based from their explanation on that page I snipped, Jambler will refuse to "mix and clean" the incoming funds if their analysis [be it through Jambler API or other methods] came with a result that the fund is tainted, thus it is not "pro-ML". This is different from mixers who [TIL: they do a Blockchain analysis prior to mixing] accept those funds and clean them, regardless the source of the fund and the "taint score".
And regardless of whose behalf is the analysis being performed [Jambler's or investors' or goverments or even the victim of stolen funds], the point is they perform the analysis and return the fund [refuse to transact] to the originating address if it is tainted. Thus, if the point of banning mixers is to protect the forum and its members from being accessory to ML and TF, then banning Jambler will not be necessary, given Jambler does not facilitate ML and TF.
[...]F daym. Gimme my 10 merits back. I am scammed. 
[...]
[...]LMAO, sorry, but merit transaction is not reversible, it can not be undone. You've been warned!