I am wondering how you can explain your approach so easily when it comes to buying and selling BTC back and forth, switching between various asset classes and how you seem to be able to identify uptrends and downtrends without any problems?

Maybe huge investment corporations or hedge funds are switching between asset classes all the time, but they have technology and algorithms and instruments in place that most people don't have at their disposal. But regarding the quote above, this is the logarithmic graph from before 2011 until now, displaying how many ounces of gold you need to buy BTC. When it goes up, BTC outperforms gold, when it goes down, gold outperforms BTC. Please keep in mind how the y-axis is structured and in a best case you visit the website and use the cursor to check out what the graph says. Seems that gold did not outperform BTC very much!
I'm just presenting my own point of view. I believe that investment funds and whales have the necessary tools and financial capabilities to make these plans a reality. Looking back at the past, we can see that BTC has been fluctuating in a 4-year cycle, similar to the traditional financial market, so I think professional technical analysts can take advantage of this. In any case, it's just a look at the past, and I hope the funds will apply it more effectively in the future. Personally, I can only DCA BTC and take profits at the distribution zones of each season.
I would like to say that Gold is better for the purpose of storing and protecting assets: Gold's advantage is its price stability and its tendency to increase gradually over time. Gold cannot be compared to BTC in the long term in terms of investment: the returns from Gold will not be as good as the returns from BTC.