Such malicious behavior of JollyGood did not bother me at all. He can live for years to have the type of opportunities. In fact, I should feel lucky that he did not give a negative feedback yet [all for nothing]. I have no doubt that he is busy with his study to find a way to fulfill the ultimate mission. Nothing from him bothers me lately. I am absolutely cool with him.
What really bothers me is how some users thoughtlessly, seemingly without even thinking updated their default trustlist. First openly
[1] and then in PM, icopress told everyone [that are in his campaigns, targeting those who are effected by Jambler's ban] to distrust BitcoinGirl.Club and they did.
Why icopress did that? Because he did not like my detailed documentation for his lie on my face and the neutral feedback I left for him & Jambler teamBtw, Jamber is not a mixer.
icopress achieved a temporary success just like he was temporarily successful for several months making everyone to believe
[blv1, blv2] that Jambler wasn't a mixer but a software provider. Until I
[bgc1, bgc2] and hugeblack
[hb1, hb2] had a conversation built up and finally theymos figured out the truth.
For the record, when theymos banned the mixers, I considered it as a punishment but decided to respect his decision.
What a shit show to attack the privacy. I was away for a week and returning in the forum then I see the topic with more than 23 pages of discussion. It's sad to see such strict punishment [I will call it punishment] against mixers. But I think theymos made a good choice. It shows that protecting the forum is his best interest.
I don't think I and hugeblack had any idea about the ban for Jambler was coming because of our discussion and some users to notify it to theymos. We were having a discussion just like a regular one [I made two posts showing why Jambler considers as a mixer, hugeblack noticed first post and replied then I made the second post.
Fun fact:
After a few days when I replied icopress, I was not aware that Jambler already is banned].
[1] [...] BitcoinGirl.Club [...] who have been working hard over the past few days to present Jambler as a mixer [...] all you need to do is update your signature when you receive a PM from me.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5387753.msg63941634#msg63941634 [note][blv1] I think we all trusted @icopress so I personally didn't visit the site F.A.Q until
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5387753.msg63943388#msg63943388[bgc1] Described connections with their partners
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491818.msg63925142#msg63925142[bgc2] Described even with the code written in the php language
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491818.msg63929188#msg63929188[hb1] hugeblack picked it
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491818.msg63925873#msg63925873[hb2] hugeblack described the diagram
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4667343.msg63934652#msg63934652[note] [...]working hard over the past few days [...]Two posts
[bgc1, bgc2] on April 10th was described as "working hard over the past few days". It sounds like, BGC sent PM and convinced theymos to take an action for Jambler.