Well, I am not surprised that the parallel thread, since JollyGood did not want to open his for discussion, was created by the person concerned.
First openly
[1] and then in PM, icopress told everyone [that are in his campaigns, targeting those who are effected by Jambler's ban] to distrust BitcoinGirl.Club and they did.
...
[1] [...] BitcoinGirl.Club [...] who have been working hard over the past few days to present Jambler as a mixer [...] all you need to do is update your signature when you receive a PM from me.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5387753.msg63941634#msg63941634 [note]If I understand you correctly, I don't think that the quote you put does not justify icopress publicly asking people to distrust you. And privately I work for him in another forum and I have not received any PM, although if what you say is true, he could have sent it only to people in this forum, which I doubt.
Besides, people in DT should know that including or excluding people from their trust lists should be done based on the feedback they leave and their trust lists, not on the opinions they express about mixers.
So, should icopress be banned for promoting mixers?
He promoted them when they were allowed, as did he did with Jambler. When they were no longer allowed here he stopped promoting them.