Re: BitcoinGirl.Club: How a condescending attitude equates to trust exclusion
It looks like icopress supporters are starting to arrive. So you blame bitcoingrils for banning jambler? Where do you and several members get their income from? even though it violates the forum rules?
So what trust should we give you? ignoring forum rules about mixers for personal gain. That should deserve a neutral or negative trust.
If drug trafficking is prohibited, who will receive the harshest punishment in court, are the drug dealers or drug factory owners? Jambler is a mixer factory
You did not understand me at all. This is not about where people earn money from or not. This is also not anymire about a mixer or about whatever you are calling it. This is about this:So what trust should we give you? ignoring forum rules about mixers for personal gain. That should deserve a neutral or negative trust.
If drug trafficking is prohibited, who will receive the harshest punishment in court, are the drug dealers or drug factory owners? Jambler is a mixer factory
I [1]
Quote
[...] BitcoinGirl.Club [...] who have been working hard over the past few days to present Jambler as a mixer [...] all you need to do is update your signature when you receive a PM from me.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5387753.msg63941634#msg63941634 [note]Icopress sent PM but it was about Hugewin campaign. He told me to put on the signature and avatar and nothing more. And also there is no where that icopress posted that we should distrust him. Which means he is only telling lies, alleging that icopress did something like that.