Re: Re: BitcoinGirl.Club: How a condescending attitude equates to trust exclusion
Then why are you listing all the members who don't trust your judgment anymore, any why deceive people that icopress ordered everyone to do this?
That ''neutral'' post you wrote to him was actually negative in reality, as you directly blamed him that he mismanaged jambler campaign
That ''neutral'' post you wrote to him was actually negative in reality, as you directly blamed him that he mismanaged jambler campaign
Icopress got a neutral tag but you're the one who's angry? Come on, is this how you can continue to use it in Icopress campaigns? Impressive way
Since when did the neutral tag become negative? Come on, you are a member of 7000 merits, don't be silly just to defend other people. @loyceV, I think you have explained the topic of belief systems very clearly, Looks like there are members who need to read it again
It seems like you were so angry about getting a neutral tag
I didn't? It wasn't me.As a DT, replying because of a negative tag given to you is ridiculous, almost like abuse. So the DT power you have is only used for personal gain.
I'm surprised a member like you went that far because you defended icopress, maybe because he always includes you in his campaigns. I respected you before and did not expect you to do such a reckless thing