I may be hated for saying this, but what's currently happening in the mempool is a feature, not a bug. The fact that we have a fixed-sized block limit means that the current clogged up state would inevitably happen sometime.
Another important reminder: Censorship won't prevent monkey jpegs. Let's leave asides if censoring monkeys would undermine one of the important properties: It just technically doesn't work. People who spend dozens of millions of dollars in monkeys everyday can bypass every censorship measure and save them straight to the UTXO set, which would be a lot worse for the rest of us.
Here's another: As long as the law of supply and demand defines the price of block bytes, we can never on-board billions or even millions of people on a layer-1 solution, unless we undermine another important property; being practical to verify the ledger.
Final reminder: The free market decides the ideal tradeoff. "Is it better to have a dynamical block size?", "Would it be worse if we traded 'being practical to verify' with 'being for the poor'?", "Would a tail emission save the situation?". These questions are not easy to answer. However, we have a lot of cryptocurrency options, each tailored to meet different needs. It's up to us to determine which option suits us best and to refrain from complaining about the shortcomings of a single solution.
Look we have to continuously look the market and shift the way we can get benefit from BTC. It's not always that BTC will allow us to do profitable trades or transactions but there are many other uses of BTC as well which we can adopt and get benefit from them until BTC again gives valuable transactions and trades.
It's not convenient to mentions the benefits as it will prolong the discussion but the point is that shift from one use case to another until the previous one come back to the game. Crying over one and not using the another is the bulliest thing we can do. Keep an eye on the whole market not to a particular sector.