I think that this approach would create new rules that were never included in the protocol and would penalize users who have already used it (like the classic hodler).
A lot of people find themselves with inputs blocked, among other things this would just penalize small inputs! because they would have to pay many more fees to be able to release these funds ... in such way people getting payment for trivial amount would decide immediately to spend it since in the long terms it can become impossible to spend
Probably this approach could work for a fork or an altcoin, I don't think it can fit in btc current protocol.
A lot of people find themselves with inputs blocked, among other things this would just penalize small inputs! because they would have to pay many more fees to be able to release these funds ... in such way people getting payment for trivial amount would decide immediately to spend it since in the long terms it can become impossible to spend
Probably this approach could work for a fork or an altcoin, I don't think it can fit in btc current protocol.
Thanks, bitbollo
as said, this is not going to be a simple decision. a complete simulation may help to understand the side-effects of such upgrade. but when we increase the block-size and decrease the block-chain length, the whole btc protocol may get more closer to its goals in whitepaper, when in the first sentence we could see it was going to be a payment system, not a system for Saving of Value.