Then, the retard nocoiner says "Nah man, I don't trust the developers."
You explain to them that it's open source so you don't have to trust the developers, you can validate absolutely everything they do and modify it yourself.
No. You explain to them that it is trustless in the sense that thousands of people smarter than both of us have reviewed the code, none of which has reached to a conclusion that Bitcoin does not do what it says it does. If people suddenly started losing coins in their open-source Bitcoin wallet, I'd absolutely not recommend that piece of software regardless if its source code was free to study or not.
I would absolutely not invite them to study an entire repository, line-by-line, to validate such a thing. Just as I wouldn't invite anyone to study the design of a car and its manufacturer's infrastructure, if their cars were caught to suddenly explode. I would simply stuck to not recommending cars that are said to explode.