That was --IIRC-- my initial confusion on the older case too, about how they determine a multi-acc if they're offering a decentralized system. But I guess being decentralized doesn't necessarily translates to be full anonymous. They still collect some fingerprints.
Interestingly, I don't see any prohibition to create another account on their
TnC. I'll try to invite their representative here, but it might took a while for them to return, given they've been away for a while.
Decentralized is just a marketing technique as far as I'm concerned. How it works is you actually have to deposit to the pool place a bet. The pool is clearly their custody, as even without any ban they usually still have to manually approve your withdrawal. Customer losses + deposits just go to the "pool" and wins come from the "pool" to your balance (still the pool) which then needs to be withdrawn.
Not looking for any victim blaming here though, there's nothing else I can say but I joined a week ago and only have one account. If I was the only one, sure maybe just an internal glitch, but this is a very common issue, people just aren't coming forward online.
I'm more concerned about the "pool" discrepancy anyway. Here you can see the difference of what they say it is and what it actually is (assuming the pool isn't separated into different wallets?)
BSC-USDT Pool (2,249,965.31 USDT) as stated on-site:
https://imgur.com/133it4tWallet address of withdrawals/deposits (577,624.18 USDT):
https://bscscan.com/address/0x59fec88dab27afc0836904231cea7a8601343d3aThey don't have any links to the pool wallets on site. So could be a stretch, but who's to say they're not just stealing the money from the pool by switching the wallet every now and then?