I have to admit that I did not scrutinize the whole deposit and bets flow, so I can't determine it myself [nor that it stated anywhere here, that I know of] but you're betting your whole balance on that match?
How does any of this have any grounds. I always deposit and bet the full amount weather its slots sports whatever im depositing im willing to lose so i play with it all.. And when i win i instantly withdraw unless there is a sports game i want to bet on immediately after which happened here. If i deposit 20k im playing with 20k and say i play with 2k if you understand how stake works i would still need to bet my money 3x in order to even withdraw you cant just pool ur crypto into their wallets and instantly withdraw anyway thats a case for money laundering.
And just to clarify when i deposit on stake it is less then 10% of my portfolio so again yes i bet my full balance just like a majority of players. I dont really think ive met someone who deposits on stake then decides never mind i dont think i want to bet this full amount unless its on slots and they are getting abosolutley ripped. Never met a sports better that deposits large and only uses partial of balance.
Also holydarkness what do you mean by "fortunately" they don have other kyc issues. IF you look at any complaint site thats the majority of their issues ? and how is it hard to believe when you yourself on this thread said that level 2 should suffice in answering and returning of funds but now its a different story? just say you are an advocate for stake. Ive complied with everything from these people and its still hard for you to believe? i dont know what more i have to prove to a person like you but you obviously are one of those guys thaat refuse think a casino cant defraud their customers. Honestly dont know why you keep frequenting this thread giving stake every benefit of the doubt and throwing words like "fortunately" they dont have any other kyc complaints
I don't understand why they needed such confidential documents about your identity and your revenues if they just wanted to close your account. If they were investigating something about you and how you place this bet why not asking any question about that?
I wonder if any other bookie, especially fiat and licensed ones has seized customer funds for that bet.
Draftkings and one other unnamed book is holding money from the accused player and those involved that made the bets at Draftkings. From what I know, other books returned the money and didn't confiscate balances. Most even paid out winnings being unaware or just making a quick payout.
Yea its very confusing/sketchy they just come back in email and say " it has become clear that information surrounding an outcome of an event was used when placing a bet we are confiscating funds you will receive no further correspondence from the accounts team regarding the decision. "
Crazy they post high roller bets and god forbid someone follows trend on their site how can they prove that i didnt just followw trend on when they were posting these bets publicly on their site.
Another reason that I believe that you are innocent is that you were following the trend. The people in on the fix, set the trend. They were the first to get in.