Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?
I want you to understand in a normal sense poor gambler don't risk bet, they only bet with the fund available to them, their slip is always long so that it will match their staking power, but in the case of rich gamblers they gamble with a large amount but few selection so that they can multiply their money not necessarily much but just a few profits that's why they make more money than poor gamblers, they lose more too, of course a rich gambler should take more risk than a poor gambler because they have more funds to take whatever risk they want, the truth is that rich gamblers are are in the forefront of making more money than the poor ones that's is if they endulge in a strategic gambling.