I was listening to Mr. Saylor explain as to why it's important for the founder of bitcoin not to move coins. It shows that bitcoin was never meant to be something that was built for profit. However true this is, if coins are moved what are the implications? And if one person holds coins in bitcoin before 2017 doesn't the same person hold coins in BCH? Why would Satoshi want to move coins if he could just move BCH? Asking for a friend.
You should have provided a link to the video so that one can actually listen and know what he was saying. But one thing I know is if a large amount of bitcoin is moved from a dormant address not necessarily by Satoshi himself then it will cause FOMO or let me say FUD as many will think it’s for sell. One thing I know is Michael Saylor is a big bitcoin enthusiast and he always talks about bitcoin been hold for a very long term and not been sold but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t sell when you need to sell, just make sure it’s in profit.
Also bitcoin wasn’t built for just profit it was introduced by the founder as an alternative currency to the fiat currency but since it’s has an advantage of not been affected by inflation people see it as an asset that can grow and the hold for profits but the main reason for bitcoin creation was to be a currency.
BCH was a bitcoin hard fork that happened in 2017 so anyone that had bitcoin before the fork happened also got distributed the BCH equivalent of the same number of bitcoin