being too technical as regards the kind of investor you are is not really necessary the way I look at it because at the end of the day, even if you're a beginner or you fall into any of those category of people you tend to outline as the types of investors, it doesn't change the narrative that what's expected of anyone that's investing into Bitcoin is that they buy Bitcoin and HODL it while adding more Bitcoin during several consecutive times which is what we've come to know as DCA. Whatever category of investor you fall under doesn't really make any difference and to be even honest, some of those things You're talking about are just mere ideas that tend to describe a particular set of people that are already in involved in Bitcoin maybe for the short term benefit and doesn't in any way mean that everyone have to make attempt to fall into any of the category You've outlined here.
ofocus being too technical as an investor is not really necessary, what matters most in to keep investing through weekly DCA strategy having a discretionary /reserved fund or floats and also and emergency fund setting a long term goal of minimum 4-10 year and 20 to 30 year at most and all this does not need to be an expert or being too technical before you can be an investor. but checking my conversation with JJG, I was trying to point out something, and that led to bringing out some information which involves much shitcoin which I have acknowledged that it is quit a bit misleading but that doesn't mean that people must be more technical before investing in bitcoin. in bitcoin Investment, as far you can have a reserved or float and keep on DCAing, and having patient not to sell then you are good to go.
Yeah, but how could we give too many shits about shitcoins in this thread. The explanation that involves some kind of a need to learn about shitcoins seems a bit problematic to me.
funny though, but my intentions was not to shear a link that will be problematic or need to learn about some fucking shitcoin, though I was expecting you to look into the important part of it because internet link doesn't know what this thread is talking about lolz.
There is a lot of mixing of shitcoin ideas in that article, so there are some good ideas in the article, but it surely is mixed up with shitcoin ideas, and it cannot even describe bitcoin maximalism without pumping some shitcoin ideas in there.
Of course, I acknowledge that shitcoins exist and are going to continue to exist, but I still would consider a lot of needs to learn about and to mostly focus on bitcoin without getting overly distracted into shitcoins, including vague references to crypto as if bitcoin was just one of he options instead of the one that all of the others is copying and correlated to.
surely most of the article explains more of shitcoin but a kind of explanation and reference but thought I don give a fuck about those explanation that concerns shitcoin but looking towards bitcoin only. like what I said earlier we should look into some important and vital message it's passing across and leave the rest shitcoin crab. sometimes we feel we are doing things right up but don't know we are in deviating or bringing up a misleading information. for the rest of your comments, I would have replied you but I understand every bit of what you said and that's why I chose only this few part in other no to repeat our conversation.