You either support a blockchain where users will initiate a witch hunt to stamp out any transactions they don't approve of (and either trust or hope that they never disapprove of the transactions you make). As a consequence, you'll then be leaving the door wide open for governments and regulators to apply pressure to stamp out the transactions they don't approve of (and again hope that doesn't include your transactions).
You are comparing apples and oranges.
There is a clear distinction between transactions that abuse the protocol and treat bitcoin as a cloud storage, something that nobody approves of including the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto.
With government trying to censor transactions that are transferring bitcoin from one person to another, which is what bitcoin is supposed to do as a payment network.
Not wanting the abuse and exploits doesn't mean you open the way for the second category!