The idea is a network of decentralized "virtual schools" (book publishers, teachers/educators, instructional designers, institutions, motion graphic artists, anyone) authoring and publishing Dopalearn compliant training (aka "Pop-up Training") and monetizing it. Each school licensed and provided with "keys" (housed in the NFTs) that allows their customers to use/open them (the training) in Dopalearn. So technically, the NFT will be housing the course metadata (source of the JSONs/mp3s) and the license/key that makes it Dopalearn compliant.
Does that mean all party (customer, school, etc.)
depends on Dopalearn server (which is centralized) to access the content? If yes, i would call your idea is centralized or semi-centralized "virtual school".
Hey ABCbits,
So if the content is authored, hosted, and monetized on their side (i.e. their website) and minted as NFTs which can be loaded by the parent in Dopalearn after purchase, then it's decentralized, right? The only thing Dopalearn will doing is initially loading (locally caching on the child's device) the training elements (JSONs and MP3s) per the metadata in the NFT (course).
We use Lottie for the animations so its all ultra light weight (for example, the English alphabet course below is 1.3 mbs, that includes 26 animations and 26 mp3s):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYF7ZymNCN0Personally, i would say it's less centralized than storing everything on Dopalearn. And if you store the content on blockchain, i expect it could be costly even with compression (or other method to reduce content size).