You do realize that all these sites communicate with each other somewhat. You are not being limited by the casinos, you are limited by the provider. If all the sites use the same provider, you are fucked. You will be limited on site after site after site.

Cases may have been resolved in your favor, but that doesn't necessarily mean you are not doing an activity that the casinos do not condone. That could mean that the arbitrator is clueless about your activities, or could be a casino error, or whatever.

IMO, casinos feel you are doing something shady. Whether you feel you are or not is irrelevant.
[/quote]

Casinos condone people making money lol, if placing semi-decent bets is doing something shady, then shoot me. I've never done any fraudulent bets, arbitrage, etc and all the cases I've opened have been resolved in my favor because of that. Otherwise they would have proof of my wrongdoings to show to the 3rd party arbitrator.

Again, I ask you to look at all the bookmakers that I've done complaints on. Half of them have exit scammed and the other half have dozens of complaints here or on casino guru/askgamblers. Why are you trying to defend those scummy casinos by suggesting I'm doing shady activities?