Without fudging the numbers, you would guess too easily 
The problem above can actually be answered statistically, and much better with Mt.Gox data than without it.
The problem above can actually be answered statistically, and much better with Mt.Gox data than without it.
Hmm
Do you mean you are fudging the numbers?I just applied basic logic; would you elaborate? Maybe all numbers are approximative and you prefer to keep the numbers you find instead of changing them just to make them work together better
Sorry. I meant that if I say Example, it means that the numbers are examples, and not actual numbers.
I don't understand what you mean either.
Scrolling back however (see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.msg6337742#msg6337742) I see that the 13k people that own 100-1000 BTC own a total of 3.0 BTC. This is entirely between the lower and upper limit if 1.3M and 13M. So I don't understand boumalo's problem either
