Could we make a hard fork to disable new inscription to reduce the network pressure. Then both inscriptoin supporter and objector can work on each chain. That may seeperate bitcoin value to two chain, and probably, one chain can gain more value,we can call the coin on this chain BTC, the other chain must called another name. Even though, the inscriptions inscribed before fork seem valid after fork.
Possible, but a hard fork when the whole market's and community's like this? It's gonna be utter chaos. People will be divided and we might see even harsher problems than network pressure if we do fall through with this hard fork you're talking about.
Plus in my opinion, the real enemy here isn't inscription or Ordinals, the thing is that sooner or later someone would try to innovate on the bitcoin network and it wouldn't work because it's just not that scalable, the fault lies in the fact that Satoshi was shortsighted when it comes to how he thought bitcoin was going to be, he made just enough to make it scarce but not enough to support the millions of potential people who would transact in the bitcoin network on a daily basis. but I'm not fully blaming him really, after all, if I was a bloke back in 2008 with computer knowledge and a basic grasp of economics I too would've done something similar to bitcoin, and I would've made a worse version of it.
For now, hard fork's an option but it's out of the table, besides, the high transaction fees are still ahead of us at this point, so why don't we just deal with the issue when it does come around?