Torrents are not used as money, that is a big difference 
And it is very hard for torrent files to be taken down, and whenever some website that is hosting torrents gets taken down they just create another one.
This can't be compared with mixers exactly since there are more centralization there, but there is always a chance that someone creates more decentralized way of improving privacy on bitcoin.
I don't have anything against kyc if it is optional and not mandatory for everything we do on internet.
And it is very hard for torrent files to be taken down, and whenever some website that is hosting torrents gets taken down they just create another one.
This can't be compared with mixers exactly since there are more centralization there, but there is always a chance that someone creates more decentralized way of improving privacy on bitcoin.
I don't have anything against kyc if it is optional and not mandatory for everything we do on internet.
Yes it is true. And any action that arises always requires a complaint or legal action between the copyright holder and the torrent platform.
In the case of mixes, it is the authorities themselves who are interested in acting and do not need a request from third parties to act. So, the authorities take the initiative to act against the mix, as this impacts much more on the government's coffers than copyright.
I just make this comparison, to understand more or less what is involved and what we are talking about. This "war" will probably take much longer than that of torrents, but I also believe that solutions will emerge that minimize this impact.