That's not correct.
In a game with 0 house edge, with other players, it is much easier to profit.
Are you going to give me lessons on gambling games vs. other players?
FYI in games of skill vs other players there is no such thing as House Edge.
0% house edge is risky, isn't it?
Ehhh...no.
What is the risk of 0% HE? Do you understand the concept? The only risk is the variance, but in the long run the risk tends to 0.
(I am hopeful that you understand this but I am sure the unlimited scammer will have no fucking idea what I am talking about and will respond with a straw man fallacy, as usual).
You don't operate a casino, so the chances of you being aware of all the mechanics are slim to none. What you do not realize, is mostly, all gambling games, are player vs player in the backend. Some corps, just do need reveal this information.
FYI in games of skill vs other players there is no such thing as House Edge.
Wrong, not true. Entirely Wrong
You do not operate a casino, why speak about things you do not know?
Even cards on stake, is player vs player.
If you win too much, you will start losing, your money will go to other players.
Likewise, I own a game. Entirely Player vs Player. No House Edge. But the edge is still there.
Right now I can go tell hundreds of players how to play.
How to beat the system..
What would you call this? If I am telling all my associates how to play the game in hopes of beating other players? (hint: It's a house edge)
In blackjack... If I was the dealer, and I told you all the cards in my hand.... Does that not give you an edge ?
It works both ways... You are just not aware of all the mechanics surrounding this industry. And that is not your fault.
It is the casinos fault, because their aim is to get more players by luring you in with unrealistic rewards.

As we can see Poker Player has not had great judgement in the past.
He has flagged, frauds, as legitimate at times. Who knows, how many users were affected by his/her faulty trust ratings.
His word cannot be trusted.