Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is a "safely compliant" (semi-)centralized CoinJoin service possible?
by
Medusah
on 18/05/2024, 18:19:09 UTC
There isn't a need for fidelity bonds with WabiSabi because no one is paying for anyone else's block space.

What's the connection between block space and fidelity bonds?  I understand that fidelity bonds serve a purpose by discouraging attackers from launching sybil attacks, as they would need to lock up bitcoins for an extended period. 

I don't know what you mean by "a regular coinjoin".

I'm referring to a system where there's a coordinator and user connection.  Users register their coins through it. 

The coordinator is not "relied on not to orchestrate a Sybil attack", any non-coordinator entity can be a Sybil attacker

Especially the coordinator, as they are responsible for approving or disapproving coins in every round.


Can you quote your specific message instead?  There's a lot of discussion there.