For some people there may be those who invest without capital, but for others or most people the main requirement is capital, on the contrary I have not found people who invest without capital, in my opinion, I do not agree with the absence of capital, because the slightest thing, the will or desire of a person can be said to be capital, to be confident.
Being able to invest into something like bitcoin is called having disposable income. There is no need for capital, as I already mentioned several times.. but you want to argue about it.
When you invest in bitcoin it means you have disposable money and in that case i also will not regard it as capital so don’t understand why he keeps arguing about this, I think maybe because he lacks understanding about it but i don’t get why a junior member rank will want to argue with a legendary rank with experience? Keeping a cool head and being loyal is the best way to gain knowledge and not argue even when you feel you are right.
Why can't lower-ranking members debate with higher-ranking members? Does the forum have any regulations about that? And that shows you lack respect for newbies, they don't have the right to learn, don't have the right to express their investment opinions?
I agree that those who have been in the markets for a long time will have more experience, but everyone has a different view on investing and just because they don't have the same view as us doesn't mean they are wrong and we are right. Furthermore, sometimes newbies don't have too much understanding and arguing is a good thing because it shows they are trying to learn. Maybe right now they don't understand and are stubborn with their views, but maybe later they will thank us when they understand everything.