1.First of all, again, the only restriction is literally taking the code and using it as-is to launch a for-profit company the next day. Furthermore, it will be time-limited, so something like 2 years from each release. Literally the same as Uniswap v3 did. And to answer the question of why, sure.
I really don't care what Uniswap is doing, especially when knowing who is behind them, how they are getting funded, and how they are doing their business.Hardware wallet manufacturer should never be compared with uniswap exchange.
I don't find anything wrong with that.
It is wrong when you are claiming to have open source code sometimes in future, but in reality this will never happen.Be honest to yourself, to everyone else, and don't ever mention words ''open source'' in connection with RingWallet.
Edit: I read some more as well and it seems you are correct, adding a restriction for commercial use cases makes the code not respect open-source rules anymore. I was genuinely not aware of this beforehand. I will give this some more thought and see if we want to go the source available vs fully open source route. My fear is exactly the one described above; i.e. someone forking it the next day and launching a competitor.
No problem, you can release it with any code you want, just learn what FOSS and open source really is.Just imagine if Satoshi was scared that someone will copy and fork his project...
