You are looking at it backwards again as in guilty until proven innocent. Show me one case where it has carried over.
Uhh... this one?
This would be insane. You are putting way too much authority in an Odds Provider. The whole dispute is between book and player. The book is using evidence from the Odds Provider showing that an infraction occurred within their book, not in another book.
The bitter truth is, odds provider
has much authority. They're the one who hold the fund. They can ask casino to hold payment, pending investigation, and ask it to be voided if they deemed it fit. I know for a fact that there are instances where when voided bets got overturned and paid, they happened because casino pays from their own pocket. The providers refused and did not acknowledge that bet, they didn't "liquidate" the winning, so they settle themselves to ensure their customers' satisfaction and long term reputation.
And that statement of yours is a bit wrong, I believe in many instances the book does not use evidence from the odds provider to show infraction happened within their book, they were told by the provider and asked to show the evidence on providers' behalf. The one made the decision to void game-related issues [though not all] are the providers.
Those things said, I am fully aware that none of my questions I asked above, many of it, got addressed or even touched by you. But I am pulling a full-brake on this topic. I think I have [yet again] derail the thread by having discussion with you that's completely unrelated to the case. If you still interested to pursue this, make a thread about it on off-topic.
One thing that I'll say to close this discussion, and for you to mull overnight:
Unless you have stumbled upon that specific statement I previously asked, about things does not carry over to other casino and it'll be treated as a clean slate, you should probably ask yourself what's the most likely outcome for that scenario I asked above,
Suppose a player usernamed holyD played on BC, and Betby found him cheating, arbing, value betting, you name it, and things lead BC to ban holyD from their platform, and then holyD moves to Rollbit, and Betby identifies this is the same person, same IP, same betting preferences, same strategy, you name it since you're the expert on sportsbetting.
Will Betby just, "oh, never mind, he is now on Rollbit, his past abuses was in BC, so it is forgiven. Peace, yo. Clean slate and all, yoo-hoo!"?
The odds provider doesn’t hold the money. They don’t make payouts. Their software is integrated with the book to put up lines and grade wagers. All money transfer is between book and player.